Liebman v. Miami-Dade County Code Compliance Office
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.
Appellant Jay Liebman seeks review by appeal of three separate orders: (1) two orders granting two different defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint without prejudice to amend, and one order granting a third defendant’s motion to quash service of process. The complaint alleged that twenty-eight defendants engaged in a conspiracy to violate Appellant’s constitutional rights. Liebman’s complaint named sixteen individuals and entities as defendants, and twelve “unknown John Does” as additional defendants.
We affirm the order granting the motion to quash service of process as to defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gilliam v. SmartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Welch v. Resolution Trust CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Grantham v. Blount, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Bank of America, N.A. v. CartusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alma Sanchez v. Security First Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- Cash Wallace Pawley, Sr. v. First National Bank of South Miami, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- FEDERICO DINARDO and PATRICIA DINARDO v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING , LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- Neptune v. BoncroftDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013