Legal Opinion

David R. Hawkins v. Andrea L. Stables

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1998No. 97-1684PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge ERVIN and Judge WILKINS joined.

OPINION

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:

David Hawkins appeals the district court’s ruling barring Andrea Stables’s attorney from testifying on the grounds of attorney-client privilege. He claims that the privilege was impliedly waived when Stables answered a question regarding advice the lawyer had given her during a deposition. We agree that the district court misapplied the law of privilege and must be reversed. The law of attorney-client privilege places the burden of proof…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. United States v. LentzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  3. United States v. Edward R. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena United States of America v. Under Seal, and Under Seal, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. James Michael FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API