Legal Opinion

Mylius v. Arnold

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1925No. C. C. 316PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, Judge:

This is an action of trespass on the case, instituted June 1, 1914, and involving the same facts alleged in the chan- eery cause of Mylius v. Arnold et al., decided contemporaneously herewith.

The original declaration, filed at August rules, 1914, avers that the plaintiff is, and has been since prior to 1904, the owner of an undivided one-half of Lot 21 and portions of Lots 14 and 15 of the Phillips and Law 19,000 acres survey of land situated- in Randolph County; that a contract in writing was executed by the plaintiff and defendant in 1904 providing that if the boundary lines to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Mumpower v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Woodford v. McDanielsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Bates v. Bates Machine Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Arnold v. MyliusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Horton v. TyreeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Siever v. Klots Throwing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Keener v. Reynolds Transportation Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. City Nat. Bank of Fairmont v. Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  5. City Nat. Bank of Fairmont v. Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API