Legal Opinion

United States v. Rennecke

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided July 1, 1886PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Indictment for Carrying on Retail Liquor Business without License.

1Opinion of the Court

Simonton, J.,

(charging jury.) The defendants are indicted for the violation of section 3242 of the Revised Statutes, in that they carried on the business of retail liquor dealers without having paid the special tax. The question you must answer by your verdict is, did they carry on the business of retail liquor dealers ? The sale of liquor on more than one occasion has beon testified to by several witnesses. In answering this question regard must be bad to the circumstances attending the sale. If the sale was under such circumstances as indicated that the defendants had the liquor on hand to…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. McNutt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  2. Heath v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  4. State Ex Rel. Missildine v. Jewett Market Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. United States v. Alexis ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API