Rutland Savings Bank v. Isbell
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge Hickman,
of the Commission of Appeals, delivered the opinion for the Court.
Two applications for writs of error were filed in this case, one by Rutland Savings Bank and the other by the other parties, who may collectively be referred to as the Isbells, and both applications were granted. From this it results that each party here is both plaintiff in error and defendant in error. We shall, therefore, refer to the parties by their names rather than as plaintiffs in error and defendant in reror.
This suit was filed in the district court of Red River County by Rutland Savings Bank against…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Texas Land & Loan Co. v. BlalockTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Rutland Sav. Bank v. IsbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burkhardt v. LiebermanTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- In the Matter of Britt R. Kennard, Debtor. Britt R. Kennard v. Mbank Waco, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Lincoln v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Ray v. MetzgerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Martha N. Hill and Gary Hill v. Winnon Earl Sword, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.