Observer Co. v. Remedy Sales Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeab by defendant from Shaiu, J., at November Term, 1914, of MeckleNbueg. Action to recover tbe amount of an account for advertising. There was a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant excepted and appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam:.
We have carefully examined the exceptions relied on by the defendant and find no reversible error.
The admission of the correctness of the account, when it was presented to the defendant, by Mr. Powers, who was then its secretary, treasurer, and general manager, was sufficient to carry tbe case to tbe jury, and there was other evidence tending to sustain tbe plaintiff’s claim.
Tbe letter of Guy Y. Barnes was competent, but its effect was dependent upon tbe evidence introduced to show bis authority to bind tbe defendant or of ratification by tbe defendant.
Tbe statement by Powers,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Alexander v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Tolley v. Dairymen's Creamery, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940