Mattera v. Mele
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Defendant Mele and appellant Weinberger, called “ partners,” were engaged from 1928 to 1933 in the illegal traffic of liquor in violation of the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution. of the United States and the “ National Prohibition Act adopted pursuant thereto. In the conduct of that business, to the knowledge of plaintiff’s assignor (wife of defendant Mele), “ partners ” used an automobile purchased by Anthony Mele but registered in her name. She claims that “ partners ” agreed to hold *551her harmless against loss by reason of the use of the automobile. Through the carelessness of their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hull v. . RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Boylston Bottling Co. v. O'NeillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Sayres v. Decker Automobile Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- McCraith v. BussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Castelli v. MeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by1 opinion
- Feuer v. Menkes Feuer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959