Legal Opinion

Harman v. Inhabitants of New Marlborough

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1852PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts in this case, which was argued by W. Porter, for the plaintiff, and I Sumner, for the defendants, are stated in the opinion of the court, delivered by

Cushing, J.

The present case is an action of assumpsit, brought by the plaintiff to recover back from the defendants a tax which he alleges was levied unlawfully on his poll and estate.

The material facts are these : —

By an act of the legislature, passed on the 24th of May,' 1851, it was provided, among other things, that a part of the town of New Marlborough, with the inhabitants thereon, should be set off from New Marlborough, and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mayor of Chattanooga v. RaulstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Plutus Min. Co. v. Orme, County Com'rs.Utah Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API