Legal Opinion
In Re Penn Central Transportation Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 26, 1973No. 70-347PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER . NO. 1087
FULLAM, District Judge.
By virtue of various applications and responses thereto, all of which will be detailed later, the Court is required to make comprehensive rulings governing the status of various retirement programs and related programs of the Debtor. A brief description of the programs in question is set forth below; the actual application of each program to particular employees may vary depending upon hiring date and previous employment history:
1. Retirement Programs. The retirement programs detailed below are designed to complement and supplement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowen v. HockleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- William K. Tate v. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- George Alpert v. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Clifford B. Doty and Helen B. Doty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Penn Central Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- In re Penn Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- In re Penn Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor. Appeal of David C. BevanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States Court of Appeals, Third CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973