Legal Opinion

Wood v. New York Inter-Urban Water Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, New York Inter-Urban Water Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 28th day of March, 1913, denying defendant’s motion for an order directing that the complaint be made more definite and certain.

1Opinion of the Court

Carr, J.:

The plaintiff is a resident of the city of Mount Vernon and procures his water supply for domestic uses from the defendant, which is a public service water supply company. He complains that the defendant has threatened to cut off his supply of water unless he agrees to pay therefor at rates advanced by the defendant about thirty-three and one-third per cent higher than those provided to be charged under a contract between the defendant and the city of Mount Vernon for the benefit of its inhabitants, which was made in 1898, and which, as he alleges, is still in force. The complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pond v. . New Rochelle Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. City of Mount Vernon v. New York Inter Urban Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Stines v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitmore v. New York Inter-Urban Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Whitmore v. New York Interurban Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API