Legal Opinion

Beechwood Improvement Co. v. Farrell City

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1936No. Appeal, 46PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Viewers appointed by the court below filed a report in which they set forth that the borough of Farrell (now city of Farrell) had appropriated a piece of land of which the Beechwood Improvement Company, Limited, was the owner at the time of the appropriation, and assessed the damages chargeable against the borough of Farrell (now city of Farrell) by reason of the appropriation. The viewers concluded their report by stating that the petitioner (use plaintiff) was not entitled to the damages assessed, and that there was no one in existence entitled to receive the same.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McFadden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  2. East Lewisburg Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Henderson v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Nesmith v. DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  5. Ruple ex rel. Lewis v. BindleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doyle Equipment Co. v. Erickson of Johnstown, Inc. (In Re Robert T. Noel Coal, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Bald Hill, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Pike County1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API