Legal Opinion

Alexander v. McNear

United States Circuit Court

Decided August 16, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

This is an action on an award, made by arbitrators, in Liverpool, to recover the amount of the award, because the sound portion of a cargo of wheat, purchased afloat by plaintiffs from defendant, did not come up to the standard as to quality called for by the contract, and because another portion was “country damaged, that is to say, damaged by being wet, or from some other causo before shipment. The contract contained this provision:

“Should any dispute arise, it is agreed by buyers and seller to leave the same to be settled by arbitration, if in London, according to the seventh rule, but if…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gratz v. GratzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  2. Waite v. BarryNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  3. Brown v. HankersonNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  4. Woodward v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  5. Jacob v. KetchamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Vidal v. KenslerMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hoit v. Berger-Crittenden Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API