Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. Rice
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1982No. 81-5725PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, members of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, appeal from a summary judgment granted to Southern California Edison Company (“the Company”) on its complaint in eminent domain. We affirm.
The Company instituted this action in federal court pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 3571 seeking to condemn a right-of-way to install electrical transmission lines over lands allotted to the Indian appellants herein.2 The United States, as trustee for the allot-tees and owner of title to the allotments, was named as a defendant. See Minnesota v. United States, 305 U.S. 382, 389,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Squire v. CapoemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Marvine Markham v. City of Newport News, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blackfeet Indian Tribe v. Montana Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. PappasNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Codos v. National Diagnostic Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Alaska Department of Natural Resources v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Nebraska Public Power District v. 100.95 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.