Legal Opinion

Dall v. Pearson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 6, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 2457-63PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

The question presented in this case is whether a party taking a deposition under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must invariably be required to have it transcribed at its own cost, or whether the question who should pay for the original transcript is within the discretion of the Court. This is an action for libel brought against a newspaper and two columnists. The defendant newspaper took the deposition of the plaintiff. Plaintiff’s counsel now moves to require the party taking the deposition to have it transcribed and filed at its own cost.

The pertinent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burke v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
  2. Odum v. Willard Stores, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1941
  3. Saper v. LongDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Kolosci v. LindquistDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1969
  3. Carol Elaine Williams, by Her Mother and Next Friend, Marcia Williams v. St. Joseph HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. Carol Elaine Williams, by Her Mother and Next Friend, Marcia Williams v. St. Joseph HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API