Legal Opinion

City of Sarasota v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 14, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

On appeal we review decree in favor of plaintiff in a suit for accounting and to recover possession of property alleged to be owned by the plaintiff and wrongfully withheld from him, for the reasonable rental value of the property for the period for which the property had been so wrongfully withheld and to enforce the payment of the amount so found to be due the plaintiff.

The chancellor made the following findings of fact:

“1. That it has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter.
“2. That the motion to strike parts of the pleadings and to dismiss the bill of complaint, filed by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  3. Mattingly v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  4. Hebb v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  5. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re General Coffee Corporation, Debtor. City National Bank of Miami and City National Bank Corporation v. General Coffee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. White v. Weatherford (In Re Abrass)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
  3. City National Bank of Miami v. General Coffee Corp. (In Re General Coffee Corp.)District Court, S.D. Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API