Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jackson v. City of Attica

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1912No. 17,761Published

Appeal from Harper district court.

1Per curiam

This court agrees with the trial court that the purpose of the mayor and council was to take into the city all of Byrnes & Mclntire’s addition. That was the “territory sought to be added.” That territory was not so subdivided as to bring it within the power conferred by the statute. Under the decision in Stewart v. Adams, 50 Kan. 568, 32 Pac. 912, those tracts which were specifically described and which were subdivided into lots or parcels of five acres or less — Berry’s Addition, Alcon’s Addition, Walker’s Addition, etc. — became a part of the city. The same.would be true of such blocks in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stewart v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API