Legal Opinion

Jordan v. United States

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 8, 2011No. MDL No. 2251Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, petitioner in two actions moves to centralize the litigation in the District of New Mexico.1 Common defendants the United States of America, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and Lara McIntosh, an agent with the IRS, oppose centralization.

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we conclude that Section 1407 centralization would not serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses or further the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. The two actions in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MARY A. ROBERT, — SIEGEL-ROBERT, INTERVENOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. In Re Good Karma, LLCUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2007
  3. In Re Crystal Poole Irs Summons LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API