Jordan v. United States
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, petitioner in two actions moves to centralize the litigation in the District of New Mexico.1 Common defendants the United States of America, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and Lara McIntosh, an agent with the IRS, oppose centralization.
On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we conclude that Section 1407 centralization would not serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses or further the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. The two actions in this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MARY A. ROBERT, — SIEGEL-ROBERT, INTERVENOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- In Re Good Karma, LLCUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2007
- In Re Crystal Poole Irs Summons LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011