Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Barnett

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 15, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John D. Bennett, J.

This is a construction proceeding by the fiduciary because *676there are insufficient funds to pay all of the legacies which will require that they abate pro rata. One charitable legatee contends that its devise is a specific gift which is to be paid without abatement.

The gift in question arises under the provisions of article sixth of the codicil which provides: "I direct that all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, including my home and its contents, of whatsoever nature and wheresoever situate, be sold and liquidated and I give and bequeath such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crawford v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. In re Van DeusenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of YoungNew York Surrogate's Court · 1987
  2. In re the Estate of BorrometiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API