Legal Opinion
Lauran v. United States Forest Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 2005No. 03-55494; D.C. No. CV-02-07229-RSWLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
The district court dismissed Plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice because Plaintiffs failed to state claims upon which relief could be granted, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and amendment would be futile. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.1 Each of plaintiffs’ nine arguments concerning the validity of the Recreational Fee Demonstration Program (“RFDP”), 16 U.S.C. § 460Z-6a, will be addressed in turn.2
I. Standard of Review
We review de novo a district court’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim. See Decker v. Advantage…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thinket Ink Information Resources, Inc. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- California Coastal Commission v. Granite Rock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sherer v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010