Buchanan v. Reliance Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
I
Appellant Michael Buchanan argues that the District Court’s grant of the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be reversed because the amended complaint in this case relates back to the original complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c), thereby precluding a grant of summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds. Because we believe that, with the information that was available to it, the District Court could not properly determine as a matter of law that the defendant did not receive imputed notice under Rule 15(c), we will vacate the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Singletary v. Pennsylvania Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Tysheia Garvin v. City of Philadelphia Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Michael C. Veal v. Anthony Geraci, Detective, New York City Police Department and John Doe, Police Officer, New York City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.