Campbell v. Weyerhaeuser
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The nature of this case and the tions presented in it are the same as those in Hoyt v. Weyerhaeuser et al. (in which the opinion is filed herewith), 161 Red. 324. The facts of this case differ from the facts in that case in this: In Hoyt’s Case his remote grantor, Jones, entered, purchased, and paid for his land in 1897 and 1898 under the timber and stone acts (Act June 3, 1878, c. 151, § 1, 20 Stat. 89, Act Aug. 4, 1898, c. 375, § 2, 27 Stat. 348 [2 U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 1545, 1547]), before its selection by the railway company had been approved by the Secretary of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Beard v. FederySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Spencer v. LapsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Hartman v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- New Dunderberg Min. Co. v. OldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Red Canyon Sheep Co. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Henderson v. Midwest Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Sawyer v. GrayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
- Lyle v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Sullivan v. DamonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.