Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this action for personal injuries sustained by the then 13-year-old plaintiff while playing basketball on an outdoor court at a park owned by defendant City of New York, defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law based on the doctrine of assumption of risk (see Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 482-486 [1997]). The risks assumed by the infant plaintiff included those created by the gaps in the playing surface. In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Abdus-Salaam and Feinman,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morgan v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Felton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Felton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API