Legal Opinion

Theodore v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtA. Franklin Mahoney, J.

This is a motion for summary-judgment in lieu of complaint (CPLR 3213). The action is based oh a judgment in the sum of $32,985 obtained after inquest, the defendant having defaulted. The moving papers and those submitted in opposition raise an interesting question, the resolution of which requires a recitation of factual background.

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (hereinafter called Hartford) issued to John E. Martin (hereinafter called insured) an automobile insurance policy on a 1955 Cadillac automobile covering the period from April 28, 1967 to April 28, 1968. On May 31, 1967 the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. DavidsonNew York Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olenick v. Government Employees InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Dyer v. Great Eastern InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. In re the Arbitration between Ottey & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Orisini v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  5. Gahagan Dredging Corp. v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API