Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 2010No. ED 92966Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Richard S. Hill appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order, Judgment and Decree of Court denying his Rule 24.035 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment and Sentence without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carleton Properties, LLC v. PattersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API