Legal Opinion

Keim's License

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1915No. Appeal, No. 2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 2, March T., 1915, by Howard A. Keim, from order of Q. S. Perry Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 27, refusing a liquor license In re Application of Howard A. Keim for retail liquor license. Petition for retail liquor license. Before Seibert, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order of the court refusing liquor license.

1Opinion of the Court

Rice, P. J.,

As shown by the order from which this appeal is taken, as well as by the opinion of the learned judge below, the court held that it had not jurisdiction because of the omission to set forth in the petition that the *632applicant is not engaged in the manufacture of spirituous, vinous, malt or brewed liquors. The precise question has been considered by the court in the case of the appeal of F. N. English, in which we herewith file an opinion. We have further reconsidered it in the light of the opinion of the learned judge below and of the extensive and able arguments of counsel in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. ConnardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  2. Fourney's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Commonwealth v. GriesingLuzerne County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1945
  3. Pierce's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Egan v. City of PhiladelphiaPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API