Legal Opinion

Snedeker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 6, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, First Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Plaintiff, Letitia Snedeker, brought this action against the defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, to recover on a thousand dollar policy insuring the life of her son in her favor. The law and facts were submitted to the court, and judgment rendered in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The stipulated facts show that on October 12, 1910, Elbert Spencer applied to defendant company for a $1,000 life insurance policy. His mother, the plaintiff, was designated as beneficiary. The premium stipulated in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGregor v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Provident Sav. Life Assurance Soc. v. WithersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Citizens National Life Insurance v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Commonwealth Life Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Cole v. Union Central Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Short's Administratrix v. Reserve Loan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Kentucky Central Life & Accident Insurance v. PembertonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Cleveland's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. White v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Monumental Life Ins. Co., Etc. v. BordersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API