Legal Opinion

Casey v. Casey

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 19, 2012No. 2110324PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

Sean G. Casey (“the former husband”) appeals from an order of the Escambia Circuit Court purporting to deny his motion, filed pursuant to Rule 60(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., seeking relief from a default judgment that had been entered against him by that court in postdivorce proceedings involving him and Jonice Dorriety Casey (“the former wife”). Because we conclude that the former husband’s appeal has been taken from a void order, we dismiss the appeal with instructions.

This is the second appeal arising from litigation involving these parties. See Casey v. Casey, 85 So.3d 435…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schnabel v. LuiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Ex Parte S. Palmer KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Ex Parte LangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Portis v. Alabama State Tenure Com'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. Reneke v. RenekeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hossley v. HossleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  2. Casey v. CaseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  3. Hossley v. HossleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  4. Town of Brookside v. Sandra Crawford MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API