Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Utah State Bar

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1993No. 900116PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Plaintiffs appeal from an order dismissing their case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We affirm.

In March 1978, Ernest and Sharon Bailey retained attorney J. Richard Calder to represent them in bankruptcy proceedings. Calder neglected to list a $1,399 debt that arose from Mr. Bailey’s liability for an automobile accident. As a result, the debt was not discharged and Mr. Bailey was prevented from renewing his chauffeur’s license and working as a truck driver. From March 1979 until August 1983, the Baileys worked unsuccessfully with Calder to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. Robichaud v. RonanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jensen Ex Rel. Jensen v. CunninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Whipple v. American Fork Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Injured Workers Ass'n v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API