Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kirkwall Corp. v. Sessa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1972Published

1Dissent

Eager, J. (dissenting).

I would affirm. The plaintiff purchaser is entitled to a return of its down payment. The plaintiff’s claim is not merely that the official barricading of the particular village and public street (University Place) abutting the subject premises results in loss of the most convenient access to certain nearby public streets; the nub of its claim is that, notwithstanding other means of access, it contracted for and was entitled to receive the benefit of the full use of all easements appurtenant to University Place designated as the boundary along one entire side of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Irwin v. Lido Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API