Legal Opinion

State v. Stringham

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 11, 2001No. 990630-CAPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THORNE, Judge:

1 1 Defendants Robert Stringham and Gale Stringham appeal from convictions for Communications Fraud, a second degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-1801 (1990), and Racketeering, a second degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-1608 (1990). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 In the fall of 1992, defendants organized Utah Treatment and Addiction Health Services (UTAHS) to provide drug abuse and domestic violence counseling. Defendant Robert Stringham conducted UTAHS's business operations, which included the accounting and billing practices. Defendant Gale…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United States v. Gjon N. Nivica, United States of America v. Mark L. Pedley, A/K/A Jack Williams, Mark WellingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Natividad Ocanas, Santiago Casiano, Jr., Ramiro Gonzalez Alvarado, Rogelio Jose De La Garza and Amadeo Uresti GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Kenneth Eugene HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. BeckeringCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  3. State v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. State v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  5. State v. SquiresCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API