Legal Opinion

Taunton National Bank v. Stetson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 25, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a decision of the Court of Insolvency, dismissing a petition to have the respondent Stetson adjudged insolvent, and a warrant issue against his estate. Hearing before C. Allen, J., who ordered the warrant to issue, and reported the case for the consideration of the full court; such decree to be entered as justice might require. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

Under the Pub. Sts. e. 157, § 15, this court has jurisdiction, upon the bill or petition of any party aggrieved, to revise and correct the decisions of a court of insolvency, either in matters of law or of fact, except where special provision is otherwise made. Lancaster v. Choate, 5 Allen, 530. The question in the case before us is, therefore, whether, upon the facts shown in this court, a warrant should issue against the estate of the respondent Stetson.

The insolvency law provides that, if a person whose goods or estate are attached upon mesne process in a civil action for the sum of one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodward v. SartwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Tobey v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Dickinson v. Metacomet National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. Winchester v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jaquith v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Faneuil Hall National Bank v. MeloonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Jackson v. EnsignMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. In re Cochrane & Harper Securities Co. of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API