Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 1, 1972No. 71-1339PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an interlocutory appeal by the State from an order granting a motion to suppress. At the hearing on the motion to suppress, it was apparent that the evidence adduced was not all that was actually seized from the defendant at the time she was apprehended, some of the evidence having been stolen from the legal custodian pending the trial court proceedings.

We find that the trial court committed error in suppressing the evidence because all of it was not present at the hearing. While this might be a good ground for denying its admission into evidence at the time it is offered [Deeb v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robertson v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. North v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Stunson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  5. Deeb v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marion v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. State v. ByrneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. STATE OF FLORIDA v. SELAH FOXDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API