Legal Opinion

Matter of Vey

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 12, 1993PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

272 N.J. Super. 199 (1993)

639 A.2d 724

IN THE MATTER OF ANASTASIA M. VEY, POLICE OFFICER OF NORTH WILDWOOD CITY.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted February 24, 1993.

Decided March 12, 1993.

Before Judges KING and THOMAS.

Wallen and Beakley, attorneys for appellant Anastasia M. Vey (Robert P. Beakley, of counsel.)

Stagliano & DeWeese, attorneys for respondent City of North Wildwood (David S. DeWeese, of counsel).

Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent New Jersey Merit System Board (Mary C. Jacobson, Senior Deputy Attorney General, of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henry v. Rahway State PrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Campbell v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. City of Newark v. Natural Resource Council in the Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Matter of VeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. In Re CarrollNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  2. Matter of VeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. In the Matter of Paul Williams, Township of LakewoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  4. Thurber v. City of BurlingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  5. Bd v. Division of Medical Assistance & Health Serv.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API