Legal Opinion
Kumar Krishna v. Colgate Palmolive Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 9, 1993No. 648Published
1Opinion of the Court
7 F.3d 11
62 USLW 2196, 17 Employee Benefits Cas. 1510,
Pens. Plan Guide P 23885F
Kumar KRISHNA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY and The Equitable Group & Health
Insurance Company, Defendants,
Rochelle S. Kapur, as Administratrix CTA of the Estate of
Brij L. Kapur, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,
and
Rochelle S. Kapur, Individually, Nand L. Kapur, and Krishna
Lal Kapur, Counterclaim Defendants.
No. 648, Docket 92-7809.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 3, 1992.
Decided Sept. 9, 1993.
Mark S. Cash, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Joseph Trachtenberg,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.