Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Hazzard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1906No. 1535PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, on error from Dallas County. Morrison sued Hazzard and others, and prosecuted error from a judgment sustaining a general demurrer and dismissing his petition. On affirmance he obtained writ of error from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

R. H. Morrison instituted this suit in the District Court of Dallas County against Elizabeth Hazzard, a resident of the State of Pennsylvania; B. O. Weller, a resident of Dallas County, Texas; H. A. Kahler, a resident of the State of New York; Franklin Lawrence, administrator, etc., or Archilus Lawrence, resident of Pennsylvania, and many persons who are nonresidents of this state, charged to be the heirs of said Archilus Lawrence and Franklin Lawrence, each deceased, but we deem it unnecessary to give the names of the alleged heirs. The petition alleged in substance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hermann v. LikensTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Smith v. CrosbyTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Giddings v. DayTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Moran v. PratherSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Wlllmering v. McGaugheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Dallas Cooperage & Woodenware Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Remington Rand, Inc. v. Sugarland IndustriesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  3. Horne Zoological Arena Co. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Remington Rand, Inc. v. Sugarland IndustriesTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Cities Service Oil Co. v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API