Legal Opinion

Mentis v. Barnard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994No. D-3869PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doggett

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice GONZALEZ, Justice HIGHTOWER, Justice HECHT, Justice GAMMAGE, and Justice ENOCH join.

We consider trial court exclusion of the testimony of an expert witness on the grounds that he had not been designated “as soon as practical” under Rule 166b(6)(b) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

While crossing a street, Thelma Mentis was struck and killed by an automobile driven by John Barnard. Although suit was filed shortly after her death, the attorney who tried the case was not retained until about three months before trial. In response to discovery, that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Morrow v. H.E.B., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. First Title Co. of Waco v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. EF Hutton & Co., Inc. v. YoungbloodTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Johnson v. Lynaugh, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. v. SevcikTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Fort Brown Villas III Condominium Ass'n v. GillenwaterTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEX. v. Strube, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Crawford v. Hope, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  5. Gulf Liquids New River Project, LLC v. Gulsby Engineering, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API