Legal Opinion

Hilmer v. Hezel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1973No. 34593PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Judge.

This case arose from a two-car collision. Plaintiff sued for damages and defendant counterclaimed; the jury found against both. Defendant alone appeals from the adverse judgment on his counterclaim.

Defendant contends the trial court improperly denied him the right to impeach plaintiff on cross examination by using plaintiff’s prior inconsistent statements. Conversely, plaintiff contends the trial court properly excluded the statements because in response to plaintiff’s interrogatories defendant falsely denied obtaining statements made by plaintiff. That is the only issue on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aulgur v. ZylichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Combellick v. RooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Thomas v. FitchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State v. DenmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. Keyte v. ParrishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Tennis v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Garnett v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Williams v. MauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. Peoples-Home Life Ins. Co. v. HaakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API