Many, Blanc & Co. v. Krueger
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Mancha Bruggemeyer, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mack
On a note executed by the defendants, Eugene Krueger and Sophia, his wife, to plaintiff for the amount of his matured indebtedness, a judgment was rendered in the Municipal Court against the husband and in favor of the wife, from which plaintiff appealed.
Mrs. Krueger, who concededly is only a surety, pleaded, among other pleas, non assumpsit and fraud and circumvention in the execution of the instrument, but she did not plead want of consideration.
By chapter 98, section 9 of the Revised Statutes of 1874 (Hurd’s Rev. St. 1908, p. 1462, section 9) which section was not repealed by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. StubbingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Wilson v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Naef v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Harrell v. Tenant, Walker & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Guaranty Co. v. State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927