Legal Opinion

Ziepke v. Cusimano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff against defendants, with costs. The fifth finding of fact is reversed and this court finds the ninth finding of fact proposed by plaintiffs. The reassignment and delivery to plaintiffs, before the commencement of the action, of the promissory notes in question, carried with it the chattel mortgage given as collateral security therefor. (Stillman v. Northrup, 109 N. Y. 473.) It was unnecessary for the appellants to exhaust their remedy upon the mortgage before suing upon the notes. (Kmetz v. DeRonde,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stillman v. . NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Kmetz v. . De RondeNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baronberg v. HumphreysCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API