Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast Savings Society v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1901No. S.F. No. 1503PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff is incorporated under the. laws of this state for the purpose of carrying on the business of a building and loan society, and banking incidental to said business, and has been so engaged since its organization. In connection with its business, the firm of J. & W. Seligman, bankers, doing business in the city of New York, have been its correspondents, and it has been accustomed, from time to time, in the course of its banking business, to place money with them to its credit, and to sell, exchange, and draw drafts against the same in the usual and ordinary way customary among…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Mackay v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Great Southern Life Insurance v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Home Escrow Service Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Roberts v. LynchUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Commonwealth v. Alford'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API