P.A.M. Transport, Inc. v. Eason

Appellant P.A.M. Transport, Inc. (P.A.M.), appeals from the June 19, 2017 opinion of the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission (Commission) that ruled appellee David Eason sustained a compensable injury. The full Commission's opinion reversed the opinion of the administrative law judge (ALJ) who ruled Eason failed to prove a compensable injury. P.A.M.'s sole argument on appeal is that the Commission's decision is not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.

Eason worked for P.A.M. as a truck driver in training. On the day of the incident, Eason was riding with his mentor, Robert…