Legal Opinion

Curry v. Rivers

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 3, 1961No. 349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

The claim of the plaintiff is that the jury verdict returned for the defendant in this case was affected by inadmissible testis mony improperly received.

A sewer line running from the plaintiffs’ new home to the municipal sewer main, on several occasions during the first two years of ownership, backflowed into their cellar playroom, causing damage. Ultimate relief was had only after the original orangeburg and clay tile pipe line to the street was replaced with cast iron pipe. This action sought to charge the defendant with responsibility on the basis that, as builder in 1957, he had made the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
  2. Parker v. HoeferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
  3. Holton Estate v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
  4. Knight v. WilleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  5. State v. TatkoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DragonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  2. Bradley v. Buck BuckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API