Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Charles

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1985No. TC 80,230; CA A29488; SC S31309PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We accepted review in this case to consider the meaning of the term “qualified expert witness” as that term is used in the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 USC § 1912(e). In addition to the Court of Appeals’ interpretation of that term, its decision rested on an independent ground, the state’s failure to show that remedial efforts to prevent the breakup of the family were unsuccessful. The state petitioned for review on one ground only. At oral argument, the state conceded that, regardless of this court’s resolution of the issue on which review is sought, we must affirm the Court of Appeals on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fitch v. Public Welfare DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Day v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. STATE EX REL. DEP'T OF MULTNOMAH CTY. v. CharlesOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API