Legal Opinion

Dillman v. Fulwider

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1914No. 8,323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Monroe Circuit Court; J ames B. Wilson, Judge. Action, by James L. Dillman and others against Oscar Fulwider and another. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

The following is the substance of appellants’ complaint: That on March 29, 1881, David C. Dill-man died testate in Monroe County, Indiana, the owner in fee of thirty-one acres of land in said county, specifically described in the complaint; that he left surviving him, as his only heirs at law, his widow, Nancy A. Dillman, a second, childless wife, and the appellants, who are his children by a former marriage, except appellant, Lora Bell Turner, who is a child of a deceased child of such former marriage; that “said decedent, by his will, executed on the 15th day of November, 1880, devised to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. White v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Utterback v. TerhuneIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Bryan v. UlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of WarrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Taylor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API