Legal Opinion

United States v. Weems

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 9, 1982No. 81-3555PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GARZA, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals the district court’s decision below holding that crop dealers who purchased crops and negotiable warehouse receipts subject to duly recorded crop pledges in favor of the Farmers Home Administration were not liable for conversion. For the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand.

In 1976 and 1977, Charles R. and Tresa C. Weems of Winnsboro, Louisiana, executed three promissory notes secured by chattel mortgages and crop pledges in favor of the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA). Those security instruments were duly recorded in Franklin Parish…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Grain Company v. Clem Martin and Clem Martin, Individually and D/B/A Martin Brothers & SonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. City Bank and Trust Co. v. Marksville Elevator Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Alexandria Production Credit Ass'n v. HornLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. United States v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Evangeline Bank & Trust Co. v. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WeemsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API