Legal Opinion
Kim v. Kim
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 2014No. WD 76414PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES EDWARD WELSH, Chief Judge.
Won II Kim appeals from the circuit court’s dismissal with prejudice of his pro se “motion” for malicious prosecution. Because of the woeful inadequacies of Won Kim’s brief, which prevent us from determining what his complaint is, we dismiss Won Kim’s appeal.
Won Kim appears pro se in this appeal. We hold pro se appellants to the same procedural rules as attorneys, and we do not grant them preferential treatment regarding compliance with those rules. Wilson v. Carnahan, 25 S.W.3d 664, 667 (Mo.App.2000). Failure to comply with the rules of appellate procedure…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shochet v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wilson v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Carroll v. AAA Bail BondsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Stickley v. Auto Credit, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bridges v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wallace v. FrazierMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Michael Summers v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State, Dept. of Social Services, Family Support Division v. ShipleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Dave Campbell and Catrenia Dawn Campbell v. Woodland Lakes Trusteeship, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- David Mecey and Robin Mecey, Appellants, v. Harps Food Stores, Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.