Legal Opinion

Carson v. Federal Reserve Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.

The action is by trustees in bankruptcy to recover $10,363.93 paid by the bankrupt to defendant upon the ground that such payment constituted a voidable preference under the Bankruptcy Act. The defendant is the Federal Reserve Bank in the Second Federal Reserve District. Its main office is in New York city, and it has a branch at Buffalo. The bankrupt, Zartman & Co., was a partnership doing business as private bankers in Waterloo, Seneca county, N. Y.

*227The facts out of which the controversy arises may be broadly stated as follows. On May 16 and 17, 1927, thirty-seven of defendant’s member banks…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Metropolitan National Bank of New York v. LoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Dickerson v. . WasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. S. E. Hall, Inc. v. Farmers' Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  3. Farmers Exchange Bank Ex Rel. Commissioner of Finance v. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Vann v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1929
  5. Wolf v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API