Carson v. Federal Reserve Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.
The action is by trustees in bankruptcy to recover $10,363.93 paid by the bankrupt to defendant upon the ground that such payment constituted a voidable preference under the Bankruptcy Act. The defendant is the Federal Reserve Bank in the Second Federal Reserve District. Its main office is in New York city, and it has a branch at Buffalo. The bankrupt, Zartman & Co., was a partnership doing business as private bankers in Waterloo, Seneca county, N. Y.
*227The facts out of which the controversy arises may be broadly stated as follows. On May 16 and 17, 1927, thirty-seven of defendant’s member banks…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Metropolitan National Bank of New York v. LoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Dickerson v. . WasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- S. E. Hall, Inc. v. Farmers' Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Farmers Exchange Bank Ex Rel. Commissioner of Finance v. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Vann v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1929
- Wolf v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937