Legal Opinion

Rieger v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 7, 1930No. K-90PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

The plaintiff, Commander Augustine Watchman Rieger, an officer of the United States Navy, sues to recover the difference in rental and subsistence allowances between those *636of an officer without dependents, in which status he has been paid, and an officer with a dependent.

Between July 1, 1922, and July 1, 1926, he received rental and subsistence allowance as an officer with a dependent mother. Since July 1, 1926, he has been denied these allowances. Recovery is sought for rental allowance because of a dependent mother from July 1, 1926, to March 15, 1928, and for subsistence allowance because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  2. Freeland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Odlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  2. Garcia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  3. Harbaugh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  4. Whiting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  5. Spalding v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API