Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Clark v. Johnson Regional Medical Center

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 11, 2010No. 09-431Published

1ConcurrenceWills, J.

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-55-213(e) is the applicable venue provision in this case. I also agree that section 16-55-213(e) is constitutional under the separation-of-powers doctrine. I write separately because, in my view, it is not necessary to look beyond the provisions of our constitution to reach this conclusion.

The majority correctly concludes that Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-55-213(e) (Repl.2005) is constitutional because “venue is a matter that lies within the province of the General Assembly.” The majority also mentions,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wells v. PurcellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Weidrick v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Jones v. MearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Rockefeller v. HogueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Summerville v. ThrowerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API