Legal Opinion

Taft v. Bronson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Frank E. Taft, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Broome Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Broome on the 15th day of August, 1917, denying his motion for judgment on the pleadings and sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, J.:

The complaint sets forth a cause of action against the defendant for false and fraudulent representations in the sale to the plaintiff by the defendant of 150 shares of the capital stock of a corporation organized and controlled by the defendant. It is alleged that such false and fraudulent representations consisted in statements that the corporation was doing a good business and that it practically had no debts or obligations, which representations were false and known by the defendant to be false and were made by him with intent to deceive and defraud the plaintiff; that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowen v. . MandevilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Franklin H. Kalbfleisch Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. France & Canada Steamship Corp. v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Sommer v. EhrgottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. France & Canada Steamship Corp. v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. France & Canada Steamship Corp. v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Neuss, Hesslein & Co. v. MeadowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API